Radial head fractures

mason 1Radial head fracture

 

Mechanism

 

FOOSH (fall on outstretched hand)

Axial load with a valgus force

 

Anatomy

 

Lesser sigmoid notchLesser sigmoid notch 2

 

Radial head

 

Articulation Safe zone
Superior concave for articulation with capitellum

 

Small non articulating portion of rim

 

Rim articulates with lesser sigmoid notch of ulna

 

110 degrees

Between radial styloid and lister's tubercle

 

 

Lesser sigmoid notch

Lesser sigmoid notch articulation

 

Blood supply poor - single intra-osseous vessel

 

Hotchkiss modification of Mason Classification

 

Mason Classification

 

Type 1: Undisplaced fracture / Intra-articular displacement < 2mm/ No mechanical limitation to forearm rotation

 

If in doubt, inject LA into radiocapitellar joint / soft spot and rotate elbow

 

mason 1mason 1

Type I radial head fractures

 

Type 2: Displacement > 2mm / Motion mechanically limited / Reconstructable

 

Radial Head Fracture Mason 2Type 3 RH 2Radial Head Fracture Type 2 CT

Type 2 radial head fractures

 

Type 3:  Severely comminuted fracture / Non reconstructable

 

Type 3 radial headRH type 3 CT

Type 3 radial head fractures

 

Type 4: Radial head fracture with elbow dislocation

 

Mason Type 4 1Mason Type 4 2

Type 4 radial head fractures

 

Complicated Radial Head Fracture

 

1.  Associated injuries

 

Kaas et al JSES 2011

- MRI of 42 radial head fractures

- 24/42 (57%) elbows had LCL injury

- 1/42 (2%) had a MCL injury

- 16/42 (38%) had an injury of the capitellum

- 1/42 (2%) had a coronoid fracture

- 2/42 (5%) had loose osteochondral fragments

 

Type 1 coronoidType 2 coronoid

Conoid fractures

 

2.  Elbow Dislocation

 

Terrible triad: radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, LCL injury

 

www.boneschool.com/elbow-dislocation

 

3.  Essex Lopresti

 

Fracture radial head + disruption interosseous membrane + dorsal dislocation of DRUJ

 

www.boneschool.com/DRUJ-instability

 

Nonoperative Management

 

Indications

 

Mason 1

 

No block to rotation

 

Mason 2

 

Lanzerath et al JSES 2021

- systematic review ORIF v nonoperative treatment for Mason II

- 11 studies and 319 patients

- ORIF: 90% good or excellent results, 7% reoperation, OA 5%

- nonoperative: 95% good or excellent results, OA 12%

 

Yoon et al CORR 2014

- isolated partial radial head fractures displaced > 2 but < 5 mm

- 30 ORIF versus 30 nonoperative

- ORIF group younger and fragments more displaced

- better outcomes in nonoperative group

- 8 cases of mild HO in operative group, and 2 hardware failures

 

Operative Management

 

Indications for surgery

 

van Riet et al Should Elbow 2020

- mechanical block after hematoma aspiration

- displacement > 5 mm

- comminuted fractures (> 2 parts)

 

Options

 

Radial head fixation

Radial head resection

Radial Head Arthroplasty (RHA)

 

Chaijenkij et al Musculoskeletal Surg 2021

- meta-analysis

- 210 ORIF v 227 radial head arthroplasty v 152 radial head resection

- radial head arthroplasty had highest outcome scores and lowest complication rate

 

Kumar et al Indian J Orthop 2022

- systematic review of radial head resection v arthroplasty

- 6 comparative studies with 200 patients

- no significant difference in outcomes

- better ROM with excision

 

Approach options

 

  Kocher approach Kaplan approach Hotchkiss approach Boyd approach
Interval

 

Between anconeus and ECU

 

Interval between EDC and ECRB

Split EDC

Elevate Anconeus and ECU

Detach supinator from ulna

Disadvantage

May risk injury to LCL

 

May risk injury to PIN

 

May risk injury to PIN May risk injury to PIN
Advantage

 

May make LCL repair easier

 

Protects LCL Protects LCL Protects LCL

 

AO Surgery Kocher & Kaplan 

 

AO Surgery Boyd approach

 

Vumedi Kocher versus Kaplan

 

Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN)

 

Gruenberger et al JSES Int 2022

- 45 cadavers with EDC splint

- used lateral epicondyle as landmark

- PIN 70 +/- 10 mm from lateral epicondyle

 

Tornetta et al CORR 1997

- PIN 40 - 48 mm from radiocapitellar joint

 

Radial Head Fixation

 

Radial Head ORIFRadial Head ORIF

 

Indication

 

Significant fragment displacement

Reconstructable

 

Technique

 

RHRH RH

 

Vumedi radial head ORIF video

 

Vumedi radial head ORIF video 2

 

Kocher / Kaplan approach

- dissect muscles off capsule

- divide capsule in line with incision / create anterior and posterior flaps

- pronate forearm to protect PIN

- no Hohmann retractors anteriorly and limit distal dissection

- reduce fracture

 

Identify safe zone for implants

- posterolateral portion of cartilage / yellow and thinner, non articulating cartilage

- 90o arc between radial styloid and Lister's tubercle

- 2.5 or 3.5 headless compression screws

 

Complications

 

PIN injury

Intra-articular screws

Hardware failure

Heterotopic ossification

AVN

Non union

 

RH nonunion

Radial head fragment nonunion

 

Results

 

Outcomes

 

Ring et al JBJS Am 2002

- 56 patients with ORIF radial head

- 30 Mason 2, 26 Mason 3

- 13/14 patients with comminuted Mason 3 with > 3 fragments had poor outcome

- 15/15 patients with simple Mason 2 had good outcomes

- best results with 3 or fewer fragments

 

Arthroscopic versus open ORIF radial head

 

Mousa et al JSES Rev 2024

- systematic review of arthroscopic versus open ORIF radial head

- reduced stiffness and HO with arthroscopic fixation

 

Radial Head Arthroplasty (RHA)

 

Radial Head Replacement LateralRadial Head Replacement AP

 

Design

 

Cobalt chrome / pyrocarbon / titanium

 

Modular - various head diameter / thickness + various stem sizes + collars to build up radial neck if required

 

Fixation - press fit v loose fit

 

Technique Modular Titanium Radial Head Arthroplasty

 

AO Surgery Reference Radial head arthroplasty

 

Evolve Radial Head PDF

 

Vumedi Evolve Radial Head arthroplasty

 

Radial head replacementsRadial head fragmentsRadial Head Replacement

 

Lateral approach to elbow / Kaplans or Kocher

- open capsule

- divide annular ligaments

- excise radial head fragments

- use fragments to estimate diameter and thickness of radial head

- if in doubt, downsize

- deliver radial neck

- do not place Hohman retractor anteriorly to protect PIN

- ensure neck cut flat to avoid maltracking

- want 60% contact of radial neck with prosthesis

- insert trial broaches into neck

- insert trial head diameter and neck length

- check no overstuffing on xray

- insert prosthesis

- repair annular ligament

- inspect +/- repair LCL

 

Overstuffing

Lesser sigmoid notch Symmetry of ulnohumeral joint

 

Radial head shoulder articulate with lesser notch

 

Ensure no gapping of lateral ulnohumeral joint

Lesser sigmoid notch Overstuffing
Radial Head Replacement Lysis AP radial head

 

Frank et al JBJS Am 2009

- cadaveric study

- increased medial ulno-humeral joint line gapping with overlengthening of 6 or 8 mm

- increased lateral ulno-humeral joint line gapping with overlengthening of 2 mm

 

Results

 

Heijink et al JBJS Rev 2016

- systematic review of radial head arthroplasty

- 30 articles with 727 patients

- 8% revision rate

- Mayo Elbow Performance Score: 85% good or excellent

- no evidence of superiority of bipolar / monopolar / fixation technique

 

Davey et al JSES 2021

- systematic review of minimum 8 year outcomes of RHA

- 10 studies with 432 elbows

- 86% minimal or no pain

- 9% loosening

- 27% degenerative change

- 3% RHA revision rate

- 15% removal of implants

 

Complications

 

Stiffness

Over lengthening / over stuffing

Heterotopic ossification

Pain - malposition / loosening / infection / radiocapitellar OA

Instability - associated Coronoid / LCL / MCL injuries

 

Ulnohumeral joint space

Heterotopic ossification

 

Radial Head Poorly Positioned

Radial arthroplasty malposition

 

RHARHA

Infection

 

Radial Head Resection

 

Indication

 

Elderly patient

Coronoid intact

 

Contra-indication

 

Elbow dislocation

LCL / MCL / Interosseous membrane disrupted

 

Complications

 

Proximal radius migration

DRUJ instability and pain

Valgus instability elbow

Arthritis (deceased SA, increased contact stresses)

 

Results

 

Antuna et al JBJS Am 2010

- 26 patients < 40 treated with radial head resection

- minimum 15 year follow up

- 81% no elbow pain

- good or excellent results 92%

- all had xray evidence of arthritic change

- increased valgus / carrying angle in all